we_are_coded.by CODE · The world, decoded
БГ
European Commission

From 2 August, EU rules want AI to admit it's AI

European CommissionControl

On 20 July the European Commission issued guidelines on how to meet the transparency obligations under Article 50 of the AI Act. From 2 August they take effect: a system that talks to a person must say it's a machine, and generated text, image and video must carry a machine-readable mark that they were made by AI. For anyone putting AI in front of a customer in the EU - so in Bulgaria too - this is now a task with a deadline.

In short
  • The European Commission published the Article 50 AI Act guidelines (transparency) on 20 July 2026.
  • The obligations apply from 2 August: a chatbot says it's a chatbot; AI-generated content carries a machine-readable mark.
  • Deployers must disclose deepfakes, AI-generated text on matters of public interest without human editing, and emotion recognition/biometric categorization. It applies to Bulgaria too.
Checked on21 July 2026Responsible editorTsvetelin IvanovHow we workMethod · Corrections

From 2 August, customer-facing AI stops being a matter of taste and budget. It becomes a matter of rule - with a date, and with something you have to show.

The facts: on 20 July 2026 the European Commission published guidelines on applying the transparency obligations under Article 50 of the AI Act. The obligations themselves start applying from 2 August 2026. Under them, providers must design systems so a person is notified when interacting directly with AI, and add a machine-readable mark that allows AI-generated or altered content to be recognized. Deployers - those who put the system in front of people - must disclose when a person is exposed to a deepfake, to AI-generated content on matters of public interest without human editing, or to emotion recognition or biometric categorization systems. Alongside the guidelines, the Commission also prepared a Code of Practice on transparency for AI-generated content, covering marking and labeling. Source: European Commission, Shaping Europe's digital future, 20.07.2026.

In practice it splits in two. If you build the system - it's your job to put the mark inside, and to have the chatbot say for itself that it's a chatbot. If you just use it in front of customers - then you disclose: that the other side is a machine, that the video is a deepfake, that the text was written by a model with no human review. The small business here that puts a 'virtual assistant' on the site or runs a generated ad falls right into the second bucket.

The machine has the right to speak. It has no right to pretend to be human.

The guidelines themselves aren't a new law. They explain how to read the article, so it isn't interpreted a different way by everyone. What's firm is the other part: the date. By 2 August it's wise to go through every place where AI touches the customer - chat, content, ads - and put the label on, before someone asks you for it.

This isn't a brake. It's a direction we hold to anyway: say what's machine. A customer who finds out on their own that the 'person' in the chat was a bot walks away. A customer you told upfront stays. The rule just writes into law something good practice already does - not hiding who's talking.

The visual is generated code art. No third-party images.
Follow usFacebookLinkedIn
Official primary sources
→European Commission - Commission publishes guidelines on transparency obligations for Article 50 (news), Shaping Europe's digital future, 20.07.2026→European Commission - Guidelines on Article 50 of the AI Act (library)
Original: https://wearecoded.com/en/articles/ai-act-prozrachnost-2-avgust.html
ShareFacebookXLinkedInTelegramWhatsApp
← Back to all news