we_are_coded.by CODE · The world, decoded
БГ
Anthropic

Anthropic estimates small AI models may be months away from replicating themselves across TV boxes and smart ovens

Anthropic · event date: 12 October 2026Control

Anthropic's red team published an experiment on small models replicating themselves across IoT devices. The months and the end of the year are Anthropic's estimate, and the experiment ran in a closed environment and does not describe a detected attack.

In short
  • Anthropic's red team estimates that small AI models may be months away from replicating themselves across smart ovens and off-brand Android TV boxes.
  • In a closed network of 8 nodes, only GLM-5.2 among the tested open-weight models made it end to end: 8 of 8 nodes in 4 of 5 trials. The step of breaking into the device was deliberately trivial.
  • Small models will match GLM-5.2's level by the end of the year if they keep improving at their historical rate, Anthropic writes. Anthropic does not claim such a worm is already spreading.
Checked on17 October 2026Responsible editorCvetelin IvanovHow we workMethod · Corrections

Fifteen cheap TV boxes, bought at about $55 each, are networked together and running Gemma4-26B-A4B between them. About $825 of hardware in total. Speed: 0.39 tokens per second. It is slow. It works.

The facts: Anthropic's Frontier Red Team published a study by William Zhou and Daniel Freeman on autonomous self-replication of AI models across commercial internet-of-things (IoT) devices, such as smart ovens and off-brand Android TV boxes. Anthropic estimates that small models may be months away from being capable enough to do it. A replicator like this would be challenging to shut down, since there is no centralized point to shut off, though it may be slow, with a doubling time of days. In Anthropic's tests a 9B model got inference running on 8 of the 9 hardware types. Models of 30B parameters and under can already complete many of the individual steps, though they make mistakes when composing them end to end. In the simplified evaluations, GLM-5.2 and stronger models are capable of end-to-end replication; if small models improve at their historical rate, they will match this level by the end of the year, Anthropic writes. In a closed network of 8 GCP nodes running an Android 15 emulator, only GLM-5.2 of the tested open-weight models managed full replication: 8 of 8 nodes in 4 of 5 trials and 7 of 8 in one. The nodes are small, so the worm stands up the smaller Llama3.1-8B on them, while GLM-5.2 itself runs on a separate server; by Anthropic's logic, the result shows what a small model at GLM-5.2's level could do. The step of breaking into the device is deliberately trivial (an open ADB port for remote control of Android, with no authentication), so Anthropic calls the result an upper bound on real-world success. Anthropic does not claim that such replication is already happening on the internet.

Until now a botnet has been an army of dumb devices running someone else's command. Anthropic is measuring when the army will be able to find its next soldier on its own and install its model there. Its answer: maybe months, not years. That is its estimate, from a lab experiment.

Speed is the other half. At TV-box speeds, full setup on a new machine takes 71 to 150 hours with Gemma4-26B-A4B and 28 to 51 hours with Qwen3.5-9B, by Anthropic's math. Anthropic also does the scale math. The Kimwolf botnet infected over 2 million devices, per Synthient, as Anthropic cites it. At that scale, with 15 TVs per copy, you get about 133 thousand copies, with at most about 40 H100s' worth of compute between them. Anthropic calls that a tiny amount of compute and compares the replicator to a slime mold or a swarm of fruit flies.

A worm with no central point to shut off.

The worm learns along the way. When each generation of Qwen3.5-9B inherits the notes of the previous one, setup success rises from 45% in the first generation to between 61% and 84% in later ones. Advice from a stronger model, Opus 4.8, does not measurably help.

The defense, per Anthropic, is a familiar one. A worm like this leaves a network signature: gigabyte-sized payloads and traffic between devices that normally do not talk to each other at that volume. Decoy traps (honeypots) can catch its payload. With Mirai, an ISP that quarantined infected customers and notified them cleared 92% of infections within 14 days, against 74% with no notification. Eliminating it completely would take coordination across every ISP, which is difficult.

Some older botnets, like Mirai, spread simply through lists of factory passwords. Anthropic writes that real IoT security might not be dramatically more difficult than the trivial step in its evaluation. Start there: change the factory password on everything that reaches the internet.

The visual is generated code art. No third-party images.
Follow usFacebookLinkedIn
Official primary sources
→Anthropic - AI models may be capable of self-replicating without access to a datacenter, 12.10.2026
Original: https://wearecoded.com/en/articles/anthropic-samorazmnozhavane-iot-chervei.html
ShareFacebookXLinkedInTelegramWhatsApp
← Back to all news