The US Federal Trade Commission proposed a position: if a company advertises accurate answers but secretly steers the model's output toward another goal, that can be fraud under Section 5. Public comment period through July 31.
- The FTC proposed (July 1; Federal Register July 7) a position that secretly skewing AI output can be fraud under Section 5.
- It separates deliberate steering from hallucinations; vote 2-0; comment period through July 31, 2026.
- Read: if you build on AI, be transparent about what you're optimizing for; hidden steering is a risk to trust and a legal one.
Nice on paper: a regulator finally grabs hold of the question of whether 'tuning' a model's output is deceptive. For now it's only a proposal - but the principle is clean.
Let's not blow this out of proportion - it's the US, and for now it's only a proposal, not a law. But the principle lines up with our own: honesty about what your system actually does. Disclosure, not hidden steering.
If you build on AI, say plainly what it's optimizing for. Hidden steering hurts twice: it kills the user's trust and opens a legal door you don't want open. Disclose it up front and you stay clean; hide it and you're betting your reputation - and leaving your back exposed - on nobody ever pulling the curtain.